Many schools were built at a time before digital learning
was commonplace, therefore they are often made up of learning and teaching spaces
were not designed to reflect the place of technology in the curriculum. The ITEM rubric asks to what extent the
physical environment has been adapted or reorganized to reflect the school’s
vision for ICT. Are there flexible work
areas to enable varied approaches to teaching and learning with ICT? Is there a wide range of high-quality
resources which meet students’ needs whenever and wherever learning takes
place? Have the digital learning
resources significantly changed the learning culture both within and beyond the
school?
Technical support is also seen as playing an important role
in the effective use of ICT for improved teaching and learning. In my experience I have seen that this can
be make or break in a teacher’s willingness to use technology. Where technical support and maintenance is
inadequate it’s likely there will be many technical problems that may take some
time to fix – this will obviously have a negative impact on how technology can
be used to improve student learning.
The procedure that the school goes through to purchase new
resources will also be important. Are
the currently available resources evaluated for their quality and suitability
for improving student learning? Are new
purchases based simply on available funding, or are they perhaps heavily
weighted towards some areas of the school?
Is the purchase of new technology in line with a plan based on the
school’s vision and does it take into account the current and future needs of
the students?
I think that the various parts of the ITEM rubric can provide
a really useful tool for assessing whether or not technology is being used
effectively to improve student learning. How do you assess success in the integration
of technology at your school?
Ideas in this post are based on the ITEM framework by
Naace/Advisory Matters
Photo Credit: Scrapbook Sunburst Background by Webtreats
Photo Credit: Scrapbook Sunburst Background by Webtreats
No comments:
Post a Comment